Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Marocco
- Info Rabat, old and new - Mausoleum of Mohammed V and new Mohammed VI Tower behind. My shot. --Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 22:29:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info Leaning trees over the grassy hillock of Nodong-ri tombs, in Daereungwon Tomb Complex, Tumuli park, Gyeongju, South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual perspective -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 20:29:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Poster for the Exposition Universelle (1889) in Paris, France
- Support -- Yann (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breathtaking level of detail. Significant year for this recurring event -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
- Info Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon). My shot. --Mile (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info 2 I had luck with this shot. Showing running gait: runner going from terminal swing to heel strike. Hard part was to get at this focal, right angle in perfect background-foreground, fluorescent colors of (new ?!) footwear. Actually croped OOC, AdobeRGB (⇔ Uncalibrated). Good Educational value.
- Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
- Is the picture free of any copyright issue concerning the Asics logo on the shoes?
- What gender and what age is the runner? I think you should include these kind of details in the file description. -- Wikisquack (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded and nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support An unusual angled perspective that fascinates. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 22:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Astronomy
- Info created by WhatisMars - uploaded by WhatisMars - nominated by WhatisMars -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, this is an updated version of the old nomination. This is an 8K image wrapped in SVG and available for translation. Texts have a large padding to accommodate all languages. -- WhatisMars (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question Why❕️in "The Solar System!"? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, why are the moons of Mars missing? Zzzs (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- After a further look, I detected more faults in this image. On top of the problem already mentioned in this nomination, the image is quite unorganised. There are random dots under some of the text and I don't know what their purpose is. The text placement doesn't make it very clear which natural satellites are which and they're kind of messy. I, personally, am not a fan of the font. It somehow makes the image look less professional. Not only are the main, and only, natural satellites of Mars are missing, but the natural satellites for the dwarf planets are missing too. Zzzs (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The font is due to MediaWiki's limitations. This is the original nomination and I specifically used the raster format because it can display the font. Now people are complaining about that and wanting to use SVG to be easily translated to other languages, this is the only way that I can do so. WhatisMars (talk) 12:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- After a further look, I detected more faults in this image. On top of the problem already mentioned in this nomination, the image is quite unorganised. There are random dots under some of the text and I don't know what their purpose is. The text placement doesn't make it very clear which natural satellites are which and they're kind of messy. I, personally, am not a fan of the font. It somehow makes the image look less professional. Not only are the main, and only, natural satellites of Mars are missing, but the natural satellites for the dwarf planets are missing too. Zzzs (talk) 07:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also, why are the moons of Mars missing? Zzzs (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is a visible rectangular crop on the Jupiter's moons and on the Mercury. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- That is weird. I cannot see it in my Photoshop project file but it seems that it has trouble rendering pixels at the edge of the layer. WhatisMars (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The exclamation mark looks a bit silly, IMO. I think it's okay to have the moons of Mars missing though. As far as I understand you've used a size cutoff somewhere roughly around the 100km radius mark, and the moons of Mars are tiny, they are just little asteroids. Cmao20 (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly. I hate this vector format so much. It doesn't serve any actual purpose but because people were calling me to use it to wrap the raster image, I have to use it. WhatisMars (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The least they can do is mention the moons of Mars rather than depict it. It can misinform users into thinking they don't exist. I wouldn't want to have a factually incorrect image as a featured picture. Zzzs (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, composition, and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, I love it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20, and everybody for your support! – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 21:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Order_:_Passeriformes_(Passerines)
- Info Brown creeper (Certhia americana) in hand at a bird banding station in the northeastern USA, about to be released. Note: precise location intentionally omitted per request. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support By weight, these are some of the tiniest birds in North America (other than hummingbirds), but they have a big tail they use to support themselves as they walk up tree trunks looking for insects. Because most of their time is spent rubbing up against evergreen trees, the handler pointed out they actually smell quite good, which is not something I realized I wanted to know. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Convincing in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The worn out nail polish is distracting IMO. Otherwise it has a great focus and I like the idea of the photo. — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I didn't even realise the nail polish was there until you mentioned it. -- Zzzs (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, cute, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:06:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Upupidae (Hoopoes)
- Info created by Luckhy86 – uploaded by Luckhy86 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is oversharpened but I don't mind when the composition and subject are so good Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree with cmao20. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20 (“weak” just because of the weird oversharpening, sorry). – Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support That pink bellow tail, i would remove it. Feel like bird carried some... --Mile (talk) 12:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't find it oversharpened, and I really like the fact that we can see the insect carried by the bird. -- Wikisquack (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Czech Republic#Ústí nad Labem (no photos of this region yet)
- Info created by Crutch1973 – uploaded by Crutch1973 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Crutch1973 and Draceane: A stunning drone capture, in my opinion a great landscape scene. The technical quality is a bit too noisy for my taste. Hence my suggestion of an improvement via a SwissTransfer link. Feel free to use it for an update if you like the edit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the technical quality is okay but the colours seem a bit weird to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the inspiration, Cmao20. As for the colors, I had a similar vibe, but still a tolerable one. I reduced the overall saturation by 15% and updated the transfer link above. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Saturation, level and dynamics adjusted to a more acceptable level, transfer link above updated. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Radomianin’s version is a big improvement and I would suggest to use it, Crutch1973. I would certainly support that version. If you do not like it, Radomianin should upload it as a separate image under a new filename and I would be happy to nominate it here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- On hold I've contacted Crutch1973, so I will wait with overwriting the photo a bit (one/two days). — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Draceane, thank you in advance for the upcoming update. Funny coincidence: I also informed the user about this nomination in a very polite way by email shortly after 10:00 UTC today. So thank you for your efforts to rescue this nomination to give this great image a fair chance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agree Radomianin's version is an improvement, and potential FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 13:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Ovulidae
- Info A small (1,5 cm) unusual shell of a representative of the gastropod family Olividae (False Cowries); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Rainer Halama - uploaded by Rainer Halama - nominated by Wikisquack -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BugWarp (talk) 18:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment "and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized." I guess that what is good for the goose is not good for the gander. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that the photo would profit from a more detailed description, stating what exactly we see in this photo. Hallo Rainer, das ist eine wunderbare Aufnahme. Könntest Du die Beschreibung noch ein bisschen erweitern, sodass sie sagt, was wir in dieser Aufnahme sehen? Danke! – Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is categorized to the specific event and to the "Narrenzunft" (the specific group it belongs to). I even took out just now one over-categorization. What further categorizations do you miss. I know there are all kinds of categorizations, like "XYZ facing left or right" and what else not. But that is something that should be left to those needing an wanting such categories and not necessarily to the uploader. A description in English could be provided. But it will not be as descriptive since there are no articles in English to the Event or the specific guilds. Wuselig (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Tomascastelazo You are right, I put it too soon and should have asked for this work to be done before nominating it. I am still quite new to Commons so I'm happy to learn. -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, well-composed portrait of a typical traditional carnival mask, the torch makes clear that this is from the night parade. Atmospheric and good quality (espec. when we consider the difficult circumstances: moving people at night). – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good Quality --SVKMBFLY (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tupungato (talk) 14:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support this one is FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 12:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Sarpitabose - uploaded by Sarpitabose - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Don't get me wrong, it's a very good photo. Better than any butterfly photo I have ever taken. But Featured Pictures should be best of the best, and here the head and eyes are a little out of focus. Your other nominated picture is better in this aspect. --Tupungato (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very beautiful but sadly the head being out of focus is IMO a deal breaker at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 11:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Genghis Khan as ruler not warlord; the monument is the focal point of the Government Palace in Ulaanbaatar. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The visible portion of skull on the right is annoying. I would support this candidate if it was cropped on the right, and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized (it's not even in the Frida Kahlo category). -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one has a great composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Weird and special. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's not a bad photo, and it is a valuable addition to Commons. But it doesn't have the wow factor. The focus is somewhat shaky, it might be better (the other candidate image is sharp). The cropping seems somewhat random (the cropped top right skull and the right skull. It also has deficiencies in description, there is no proper category and no proper description: are these products in a store, or something else? --Tupungato (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Request (@Tomascastelazo) Please write a more detailed description and categorize this picture. I would then support this picture. (The croppings don't shock me because it's a kind of photo where you don't mind, it's like photographing a bunch of oranges.)
- Comment If you google Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico you will be surprised by the results. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- What I wanted to say is maybe the description could be a bit more detailed. You can explain for example where was this photo taken (in Mexico, right, but more precisely) : a shop, in a street, ...
- It would also ease the categorization. Because for now, there is only 1 category to this file. And this category doesn't even exist... -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Fine picture of an interesting motif but I miss a great composition in this one and it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info American Gothic. Portrait of government cleaning woman Ella Watson. August 1942.
- Info created by Gordon Parks, uploaded by Davepape, nominated by Yann
- Support Notable historical picture. Included in List of photographs considered the most important. -- Yann (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Photographic work of historical significance. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support And still a stunning photo, at least to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
- Info All by me -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I see too much of a bluish tint in the photo. Otherwise it's a great shot. — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
-
- Fernando, could you check whether shifting the white balance a bit more towards warm/yellowish improves the photo, as Draceane suggests? This could make your beautiful shot even better. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 15:18:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info Since 2018, this place (Piazza della Liberta - Liberty square) in Cesena has become pedestrian, having previously been a car-park. It is certainly a great result for children who have space to play and for architecture lovers who will be able to freely enjoy the rear view of the Renaissance Cathedral (Duomo di Cesena). In 1408 the apse was built and subsequently the 72 meter high bell tower (1456) for which I took a vertical overview of 7 photos. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual narrow composition which nicely emphasizes the height of the bell tower, and the people on the piazza add life to the scene. Question @Terragio67: The main subject is IMHO the church with its bell tower, and most similar FPs are listed on the “Religious buildings” gallery page. Shouldn’t we change the gallery link to that page? Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- The square described does not belong to the church, but since the church is enormous in height, it necessarily occupies the main scene, putting everything on the edge. Furthermore, the interesting part is certainly the apse (XIV sec) and also the upper part of the bell tower (XV sec) because they straddle the Romanesque-Gothic period and the Renaissance period.. For these reasons, in my opinion it is possible to make the change you suggested without great doubts. Thanks for your interest. Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. I took the liberty of adjusting the gallery link as discussed above. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Terragio67 (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 14:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light is not so good (we can see from the shadows that it's almost a contrejour), but the action is great (included the leaves in the mother's mouth) and the focus on the baby, looking at viewer, successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I suppose you could do this at half lower ISO. 1/1000 s would be more than enough. --Mile (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 13:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters
- Info created by Airman 1st Class Joseph Bartoszek - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ToprakM ✉ 13:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unsure how to vote on this one. A very dramatic and wow-y composition but the left crop is very tight and the image quality is only okay (noise, Jpeg artefacts). Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support 1st USA Airman who left f/64 group. Left crop could be a bit wider. Fine colors, sharp, --Mile (talk) 12:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 10:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not as good a composition as the last one of these you nominated but nonetheless sharp and good quality + interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 thank you and i will try to do better compositions next time. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 17:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info Chapter house full of tapestries (work of Gerard Peemans, Flemish weaver, ca. 1625-1700) in the cathedral of Segovia, Spain. The temple was built in the Flamboyant style and was dedicated in 1768, constituting one of the latest Gothic cathedrals in Europe. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool art on the walls, good quality, and nice to get an off-centre viewpoint for once - symmetrical is usually the way to go but it can be repetitive after a while and off-centre helps show more of the art here. Cmao20 (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry wooden board at the left is out of focus, and the odd angle of view creates an unbalanced perspective. Also the fence in the foreground could perhaps have been avoided with a few steps forward. I think a centered composition would have been better here -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Tagooty (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support considerig the pro and contra arguments. It’s still an impressive photo to me. – Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive for me, too, even if the unusual perspective is against the norm at first. But when the "wow" effect is there, the rule should apply: Exceptions prove the rule. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:57:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support An ancient steppe megalith, a wonderful example of the deer stones that dot Mongolia and southern Siberia. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree, cool motif. Maybe not the best light but good image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I'm pretty sure it's tilted to the right by approx. 1°. --Tupungato (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love the simplicity combined with the vast open landscape. But I cannot forget Tupungato’s hint – the horizon indeed suggests that the photo may be tilted to the right. It would be no problem to correct this, but is it tilted or not? Alexandr frolov, can you help by any chance? – Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 16:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info created and uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shivaliks and snow-capped ranges of the Himalayas, view from Jammu - Delhi flight, Jammu division, India. The great Himalayan range is at the horizon, with the Nun Kun massif towering on the left. The Nun, Kun, Pinnacle, Brammah I & II, Arjuna, Bharanzar and Doda peaks are visible in the image. The mid Himalayan Pir Panchal range can be seen below the great Himalayan chain, and parts of the state of Himachal Pradesh are also visible. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but although the mountains are impressive, I miss a great composition here. I think a wider panorama would have been better, and there is too much sky and not enough land. Cmao20 (talk) 19:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- +1 and very hazy landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- The image shows the tallest section of Indian western Himalaya--Nun Kun, for instance, is the tallest mountain in the western Himalayas after Nanga Parbat. @Cmao20 and Tagooty: Would it look better with less of the sky (see image note here)? UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 12:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info Ferapontov Belozersky Monastery, Vologda, Russia created by Елена Нечипоренко - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Strange compo (is it intentional to follow those stones to the building?), building is tilted/leaning out, low detail Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think the composition works. The stones work well as a leading line. But I'm not sure about Poco's second point, is a perspective correction necessary here? Cmao20 (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- There is no tilting or leaning of the building in the photo. You can check it by opening it in Photoshop Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:16:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Head oof, disturbing element in the bottom left, the threshold for FP of Lepidoptera is higher, Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but agree with Poco on this one. It's generally good but that big blurry areas is just too distracting and the quality is just okay. Cmao20 (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 11:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Colours seem slightly oversaturated compared to other images in the category, but good nevertheless Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Better than the other candidate, detail and compo could be better but it's an interesting species Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Flash fired, unfortunately, harsh shadows and unappealing light. Also not a breathtaking level of detail, in my opinion. Good documenting picture, but the background is too average -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I am also not preferred using flashes but can you suggest me the process or how to captured some moments when you are in dense forest like north east India, where sunlight is not entered properly and as it's a forest dwelling species how can I take a clear shot without flash in such tropical rainforests like habitats? can you suggest me what to do in this situation? SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Excellent detail etc. Oh yes, the flash … I dislike it due to the reasons mentioned by Basile, but I must admit that not long ago the use of the flash for such photos was completely a matter of course for some butterfly photographers who emphasized the documentary value of their images. (I knew a man who travelled all over the world to take photos of rare butterflies with his Leica and – the flash, and many nature lovers loved his photos. When a few people questioned that procedure and suggested to him to take some photos with soft flash or just with natural light, he did not understand that at all. “They are sharp, what’s the problem?“) – Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- When You are entered in such deep and dense forest there is no chance to take a clear shot without using body flash or external flash. Due to sunlight hardly entered such forests of north east India, as well as it is like tropical rain forest habitat rest of the time weather is dull you can't imagine to click them without flash. It's a big problem after all and really challenging to snap some moments from such habitat. SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your statement, SVKMBFLY. Now we have a clear viewpoint. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- When You are entered in such deep and dense forest there is no chance to take a clear shot without using body flash or external flash. Due to sunlight hardly entered such forests of north east India, as well as it is like tropical rain forest habitat rest of the time weather is dull you can't imagine to click them without flash. It's a big problem after all and really challenging to snap some moments from such habitat. SVKMBFLY (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 09:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms#Virus
- Info created by NIAID - uploaded by Ozzie10aaaa - nominated by RoyZuo.--RoyZuo (talk) 09:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--RoyZuo (talk) 09:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What is really sad is the fact that it's cut at the bottom. --Wikisquack (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 04:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Fabaceae
- Info Seed pods of a Laburnum anagyroides. Focus stack of 32 photos. Length and width of the closed pod ~ 34x8mm. Diameter of the round seed kernel ~ 4.5mm.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and detailed. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty. --Terragio67 (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clever use of framing Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perception is disoriented by sunlight on the door in the foreground. The image seems tilted, but is is not. Nice effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It's a very nice photo, but I'm not a big fan of blown highlights. If any RGB color reaches 255 on a largish area, it becomes noticeable. I'll try to create notes for the file in a moment, to mark the areas. --Tupungato (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I will improve this part. Thanks for your note -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This kind of pictures with frames shout IMHO for symmetry and it isn't (the temple is closer to the right frame). Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info The buildings next to the one in the center, red and white, are completely different. I don't think the shift is really important, due to the dominating foreground. Thanks everyone for the feedbacks. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition, nice framing effect. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2024 at 00:31:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
- Info created by T meltzer - uploaded by T meltzer - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition and great technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 12:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Interesting but I'd definitely go for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Garden of Eden, copy of Ravenna mosaic. --Mile (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 15:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice capture for the bird, nice capture for you -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not just well done, but interesting, as always. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, also thanks to the elegant curve of the nest material. – Aristeas (talk) 14:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2024 at 13:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Algeria
- Info Qal'at Bani Hammad was a fortified palatine city in Algeria. Now in ruins, in the 11th century, it served as the first capital of the Hammadid dynasty. Created by R hakka - uploaded by R hakka - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great atmosphere and mood but IMO not an outstanding composition and also spoilt a little by the cars Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice mood but lacking in technical quality, imo. Specifically in terms of noise and level of detail.--Peulle (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Noise removed. Thanks. Riad Salih (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent atmosphere—cars improve the image, it's a human structure part of the human and natural worlds. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Peulle, the fence at the bottom is also a minus and the dark areas look too dark to me (overprocessed) Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this, mistic. --Mile (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Poco a poco the dark areas look too dark (overprocessed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It’s a pity about all the fences and maybe the contrast is a bit high, but I love the special light and the deep clouds (mist?). – Aristeas (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed. Per others. — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Moldova
- Info Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail, harmonious colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting place and atmospheric photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality, interesting weather/lighting setting.--Tupungato (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2024 at 10:57:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Info a few days ago I nominated this picture without succes. I think this one is better, so I present it for you. -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support As I did last time. Cmao20 (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think its still oversaturated and colors... --Mile (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done, I changed the colors. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as the last time. – Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe the white dot in the sky can be removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 22:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Italy
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by me --A. Öztas 22:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A. Öztas 22:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Everything above the water is good, but the water is either posterized or too extensively noise-suppressed. --A.Savin 15:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- There was indeed a (moderate) noise reduction on the water, which I removed in an updated version. It should be better now, shouldn't it? --A. Öztas 16:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Water is not perfect (looks indeed posterized) but I think the rest overweights it and it's normal to have noise on a night picture -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but it may have been an effect of the brightening - the RAW file was very underexposed in that area. --A. Öztas 21:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful blue hour scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wikisquack (talk) 14:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2024 at 16:10:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Russia
- Info created by Sergnoob - uploaded and nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 16:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 16:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The upper right corner has a problem in my view, and the colors seem Oversaturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Image quality is just okay and there's some colour fringing on the leaves but the composition and mood is good for FP. Properly categorised and good caption + geocoding, so overall happy to vote support Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thought its older camera, than FF came out and than to do Panorama with f/2 at 12 mm would not bring good. But i am more to support than oppose. --Mile (talk) 19:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice sunset but moving leaves with blue fringes around not very successful in my view, and colors slightly oversaturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality issues -- fringing, towers leaning. Dominant leaves spoil the composition for me. --Tagooty (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 19:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Amazing scenery. Good enough for FP as it is, IMO, but could be better still if you denoised the sky and addressed some of that chromatic aberration on the snow in the foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 21:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC) Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)See below …
- Done Here is an edited version which removes most CAs and also reduces the noise in the sky and the far (unsharp) background. It’s not easy to remove only the CAs because some of them have similar colours as the landscape; and it’s also not easy to get rid of the noise because the sky shows a subtle pattern (maybe from editing, maybe from the Canon sensor, I don’t know); but I hope my version is an improvement. @Cmao20: Would you say the edited version is a decent improvement? @Mounir Neddi: If you like the edited version, you can use it and you can (or I can) just upload over your version. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is much better. With author's permission I would upload over the top. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- The corrected image is great, you can update it if you can.
- Thank you. @Cmao20 @Aristeas Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback, Cmao20, and for the approval, Mounir Neddi! I have uploaded the edited version right over the original one, so this nomination is now discussing the improved version. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is much better. With author's permission I would upload over the top. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support A splendid outlook, and I like how the view can wander from the snow in the foreground to the lower mountains and plains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Aristeas for the improvement. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:03, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ...and here's the 7th support. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For your information: my improved version still contained some small traces of little patterns in the sky (I do not know the origin of these patterns – maybe a compression artefact). With the help of Radomianin these traces of patterns have been removed now (3rd upload). I think I should not ping all voters in this case because the difference is small, but it is nevertheless the rounding off of the improvements. Many thanks to Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 15:13:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info created by Mona Hassan Abo-Abda - uploaded by Mona Hassan Abo-Abda - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition, nice light and clouds, no disturbing tourists. Interesting blend of old and new. Yann (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-deserved 1st place in the international 2023 WLM contest; outstanding photo! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. In this case even the significant vignetting works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 19:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice composition -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wow is there but the heavy vignetting is excessive in my view (too artificial). The white balance looks wrong. The background is noisy and there is at least one dust spot in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 07:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Yes great composition, but artificial vignetting, like here or there, which seems to want to tell us "look carefully here" as if the content was not enough. In any case my vote is not likely to affect the outcome -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2024 at 13:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info Built in 1021, rebuilt in the 15th century by the Count Federico da Montefeltro, designed and attributed to Arch. Francesco di Giorgio Martini, it was refurbished and partially reconstructed several times due to strong earthquakes happened during the 16th and 17th centuries. In 1801 the project was completed by Arch. Giuseppe Valadier in the present Neoclassical style. I uploaded this image by combining various photographs together, the shooting location, unfortunately, is open to traffic of cars and vans heading to and from the University of Urbino (https://maps.app.goo.gl/PWFfrnQrtfxM7GLK8). To avoid risks I used as a shield a monument behind me (https://maps.app.goo.gl/bhxMLUCNzUKw5auC8) which gave me peace of mind in performing the composition. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great quality and motif but I found quite a lot of stitching errors (see notes). Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for your time, I'm going to check if it's possibile to fix them... Terragio67 (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I corrected the errors you managed to find, thank you very much. Terragio67 (talk) 20:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Great now. I actually like the tourists, they are good for scale. Cmao20 (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I agree regarding the presence of tourists (as long as it is not excessive). However, I recognize correct the following observation of @Poco a poco regarding the missing statue on the right side, so I added a really valid alternative image. When you have time, take a look at it. Terragio67 (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done. Great now. I actually like the tourists, they are good for scale. Cmao20 (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing that I'd call extraordinary here (apart from the resolution, as usual), odd angle and crop (one missing statue on the right, disturbing bulding on the left), disturbing tourists, boring light. No FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly speaking, I think the lack of the second statue makes the candidacy for featured picture weak. I don't agree about the presence of tourists which doesn't seem excessive enough to disturb me. Thank you for your opinion, very useful for the future. Terragio67 (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. A good representation of the church, I don’t miss the 2nd statue. And the four tourists are actually quite nice, they look like carefully selected: A couple in mixed mood, a woman checking her smartphone, a man looking out … – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the updated version. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This version without tourist is better in my view (at least at thumbnail size). -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Poco makes some good points but overall I think it is still good enough for FP. BigDom (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Awesome quality, but it's somewhat bland, probably because of the weather. --Tupungato (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The weather wasn't great, but in some respects it helped in the creation of the composition considering that the noon period had just passed. I slightly retouched the highlights, especially in the top right where the lights were more annoying than now. To see the difference you need to purge the page's cache. Thanks anyway for your opinion, certainly useful. Terragio67 (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Alternative imageː Cathedral of Urbino, facade.
- Info In this alternative composition, I moved 5 meters to the left, compared to the previous picture, in order to have a complete shot of the facade and all the statues visible from this angle. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is FP too but I prefer the original. I'd rather see more of the building than the statues. Cmao20 (talk) 23:00, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The version above is in my opinion far more interesting as part of the composition, and I prefer a picture without people. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This composition doesn't work for me, sorry. I definitely prefer the other. BigDom (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 16:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 20 Oct → Fri 25 Oct Mon 21 Oct → Sat 26 Oct Tue 22 Oct → Sun 27 Oct Wed 23 Oct → Mon 28 Oct Thu 24 Oct → Tue 29 Oct Fri 25 Oct → Wed 30 Oct
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 16 Oct → Fri 25 Oct Thu 17 Oct → Sat 26 Oct Fri 18 Oct → Sun 27 Oct Sat 19 Oct → Mon 28 Oct Sun 20 Oct → Tue 29 Oct Mon 21 Oct → Wed 30 Oct Tue 22 Oct → Thu 31 Oct Wed 23 Oct → Fri 01 Nov Thu 24 Oct → Sat 02 Nov Fri 25 Oct → Sun 03 Nov
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.